Rover 45 1999 vs Peugeot 206 2003
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 45 engine produces 27 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Rover 45 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Rover 45 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 45 is 70 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 5 cm wider, while the height of Rover 45 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 1130 litres | |
| Rover 45 has 225 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 320 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 45 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Rover 45 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |