Rover 45 1999 vs Rover 45 2002

	Rover 45 1999 - 2005	Rover 45 2002 - 2004
Body:	Sedan	Hatchback
	The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive:	Timing belt	Timing belt
Performance
Power:	150 HP	150 HP
Torque:	185 NM	185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	9.5 seconds	9.5 seconds
	Rover 45 1999 and Rover 45 2002 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	9.4	9.4
Fuel tank capacity:	55 litres	55 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	580 km in combined cycle	580 km in combined cycle
	820 km on highway	820 km on highway

Engines
Average engine lifespan:	330'000 km	330'000 km
	Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration:	6 years	6 years
Dimensions
Length:	4.52 m	4.36 m
Width:	1.70 m	1.70 m
Height:	1.39 m	1.39 m
	Rover 45 1999 is 16 cm longer than the Rover 45 2002, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity:	470 litres	380 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	810 litres	717 litres
	Rover 45 1999 has more luggage capacity. Rover 45 1999 has 90 litres more trunk space than the Rover 45 2002. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 45 1999 (by 93 litres).
Turning diameter:	10.4 meters	10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg):	1`720	1`720

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	no data	no data
Average price (€):	1400	800
Pros and Cons:	Rover 45 has roomier boot	Rover 45 has lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Rover 45 1999 vs Rover 45 2002

Performance

Fuel consumption

Engines

Dimensions