Rover 45 1999 vs Volvo S40 2000

 
Rover 45
1999 - 2005
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 100 HP102 HP
Torque: 240 NM215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds12 seconds
Rover 45 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 45 engine produces 2 HP less power than Volvo S40, but torque is 25 NM more than Volvo S40. Despite less power, Rover 45 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.4
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1420 km on highway
910 km with real consumption1130 km with real consumption
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.72 m
Height: 1.39 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 45 is 4 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 45 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 470 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
810 litres853 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 45 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Rover 45 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`720 kg1`770 kg
Net weight:1`305 kg1`285 kg
Load capacity:415 kg485 kg
Rover 45 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Volvo S40. Therefore, Volvo S40 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons: Rover 45 has
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S40 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv