Rover 45 1999 vs Chevrolet Nubira 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Rover 45) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Nubira) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is a more dynamic driving. Rover 45 engine produces 22 HP less power than Chevrolet Nubira, but torque is 79 NM more than Chevrolet Nubira. Due to the lower power, Rover 45 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 45 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 45 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Nubira, which means that by driving the Rover 45 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 45 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Nubira. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 45 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
| Rover 45 is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Nubira, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 45 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
810 litres | 1225 litres | |
| Rover 45 has 65 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Nubira. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Nubira (by 415 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`720 kg | 1`695 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`305 kg | 1`210 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 415 kg | 485 kg | |
| Rover 45 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Chevrolet Nubira. Therefore, Chevrolet Nubira is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Chevrolet Nubira has
| |