Rover 45 1999 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 45 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 45 engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Rover 45 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.8 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 45 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 45 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Rover 45 is smaller, but slightly higher. Rover 45 is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 45 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Rover 45 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 480 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 45 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |