Rover 45 1999 vs Honda Civic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 45 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 45 engine produces 5 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 30 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite less power, Rover 45 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.3 | |
| Rover 45 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 45 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 45 is 4 cm longer than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
717 litres | 835 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`720 kg | 1`720 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`305 kg | 1`180 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 415 kg | 540 kg | |
| Rover 45 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem less than Honda Civic. Therefore, Honda Civic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |