Rover 45 1999 vs Lexus IS 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 117 HP | 155 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 195 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Rover 45 engine produces 38 HP less power than Lexus IS, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Lexus IS. Despite less power, Rover 45 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 9.8 | |
The Rover 45 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 45 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus IS, which means that by driving the Rover 45 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Rover 45 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Rover 45) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Lexus IS) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Rover 75, Rover 25 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Rover 45 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
Rover 45 is smaller. Rover 45 is 14 cm shorter than the Lexus IS, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 45 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 310 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
717 litres | 475 litres | |
Rover 45 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 45 has 70 litres more trunk space than the Lexus IS. The Lexus IS may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 45 (by 242 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 45 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Lexus IS, which means Rover 45 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`870 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Lexus IS has
| |