Rover 45 1999 vs Rover 45 1999
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Rover 45 1999 and Rover 45 1999 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
| Rover 45 1999 is 16 cm shorter than the Rover 45 1999, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
717 litres | 810 litres | |
|
Rover 45 1999 has more luggage space. Rover 45 1999 has 90 litres less trunk space than the Rover 45 1999. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 45 1999 (by 93 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Rover 45 has
| |