Rover 45 1999 vs Volvo S60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 45 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 150 HP | 115 - 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 - 240 NM | 220 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.2 seconds | 5.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.4 | 3.7 - 9.9 | |
|
Rover 45 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Rover 45 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Rover 45 is smaller. Rover 45 is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 45 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 1749 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Rover 45 has 90 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 939 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 45 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Rover 45 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`681 | ~ 2`087 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |