Rover 45 1999 vs Volvo S70 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Rover 45 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S70 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 150 HP | 126 - 250 HP | |
Torque: | 123 - 240 NM | 170 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.2 seconds | 6.7 - 12.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.4 | 6.3 - 11.7 | |
Rover 45 petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S70. On average, Rover 45 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
Rover 45 is smaller. Rover 45 is 20 cm shorter than the Volvo S70, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 45 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo S70, which means Rover 45 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`681 | ~ 1`732 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Volvo S70 has
| |