Rover 45 1999 vs Volvo S70 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Rover 45
1999 - 2005
Volvo S70
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Rover 45 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S70 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 2.02.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 100 - 150 HP126 - 250 HP
Torque: 123 - 240 NM170 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 - 11.2 seconds6.7 - 12.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4 - 9.46.3 - 11.7
Rover 45 petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S70. On average, Rover 45 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.72 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.39 m1.39 m
Rover 45 is smaller.
Rover 45 is 20 cm shorter than the Volvo S70, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 470 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
810 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 45 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo S70, which means Rover 45 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`681~ 1`732
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 14001200
Pros and Cons: Rover 45 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S70 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv