Rover 45 1999 vs Rover 45 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Rover 45
1999 - 2005
Rover 45
1999 - 2004
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 150 HP100 - 150 HP
Torque: 123 - 240 NM123 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 - 11.2 seconds9.3 - 11.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4 - 9.45.4 - 9.4
On average, the Rover 45 1999 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Rover 45 1999. On average, a Rover 45 1999 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Rover 45 1999.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.36 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.39 m
Rover 45 1999 is 16 cm longer than the Rover 45 1999, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 470 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
810 litres717 litres
Rover 45 1999 has more luggage capacity.
Rover 45 1999 has 90 litres more trunk space than the Rover 45 1999. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 45 1999 (by 93 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`681~ 1`681
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons: Rover 45 has
  • roomier boot
Rover 45 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv