Rover 45 1999 vs Ford Fiesta 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 150 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 123 - 240 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.2 seconds | 8.4 - 15.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.4 | 4.3 - 7.5 | |
Rover 45 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Rover 45 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
Rover 45 is larger, but lower. Rover 45 is 44 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 45 is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 268 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
717 litres | 945 litres | |
Rover 45 has 112 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fiesta (by 228 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 45 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Rover 45 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`681 | ~ 1`538 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |