Rover 45 1999 vs Kia Shuma 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 150 HP | 101 - 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 - 240 NM | 148 - 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.2 seconds | 10.6 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.4 | 8.0 - 9.8 | |
|
Rover 45 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Shuma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 45 is smaller. Rover 45 is 16 cm shorter than the Kia Shuma, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 45 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
717 litres | 1207 litres | |
|
Kia Shuma has more luggage space. Rover 45 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Kia Shuma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Shuma (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 45 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma, which means Rover 45 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`681 | ~ 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Kia Shuma has
| |