Rover 45 1999 vs Kia RIO 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 150 HP | 75 - 108 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 - 240 NM | 115 - 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.2 seconds | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.4 | 7.2 - 8.7 | |
|
On average, the Rover 45 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 45 is larger, but lower. Rover 45 is 14 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 45 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 499 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
717 litres | 1277 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 45 has 119 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. This could mean that the Rover 45 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 560 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 45 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Kia RIO, which means Rover 45 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`681 | ~ 1`468 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Kia RIO has
| |