Rover 45 1999 vs Honda Civic 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 150 HP | 90 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 - 240 NM | 120 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.2 seconds | 8.3 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.4 | 5.3 - 9.1 | |
|
Rover 45 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. On average, Rover 45 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 45 is 4 cm longer than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
717 litres | 835 litres | |
| Rover 45 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Civic (by 118 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 45 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`681 | ~ 1`601 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
| |