Rover 400 1998 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997

 
Rover 400
1998 - 2000
Mitsubishi Galant
1997 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 175 HP280 HP
Torque: 240 NM363 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 secondsn/a seconds
Rover 400 engine produces 105 HP less power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 123 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.2no data
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km320'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Rover 75, Kia CarnivalUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 400 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.68 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Rover 400 is smaller.
Rover 400 is 19 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 470 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
810 litres1400 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8301`755
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data2000
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Mitsubishi Galant has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv