Rover 400 1998 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 175 HP | 280 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 363 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Rover 400 engine produces 105 HP less power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 123 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 320'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Rover 75, Kia Carnival | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 400 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.68 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 19 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 1400 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`755 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |