Rover 400 1995 vs Seat Toledo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Rover 400 and Seat Toledo have the same engine power, but Rover 400 torque is 8 NM less than Seat Toledo. Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.3 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 400 and Seat Toledo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
7320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |