Rover 400 1995 vs Kia Sephia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Kia Sephia is a more dynamic driving. Rover 400 engine produces 5 HP less power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Kia Sephia. Due to the lower power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.9 | |
|
The Kia Sephia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
7320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Sephia has
| |