Rover 400 1995 vs Volkswagen Golf 2008

 
Rover 400
1995 - 2000
Volkswagen Golf
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 136 HP102 HP
Torque: 185 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds11.3 seconds
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 400 engine produces 34 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.67.1
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 400 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 225 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway980 km on highway
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Golf engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years10 years
Engine spread: Used also on Rover 200Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Volkswagen Touran
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect.
Volkswagen Golf 2008 1.6 engine: This engine is simple and reliable, rarely causing significant issues for owners. Fluctuating idle speed is often linked to a clogged fuel pump strainer or air leaks in the intake system. If vibrations or ...  More about Volkswagen Golf 2008 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.20 m
Width: 1.70 m1.79 m
Height: 1.39 m1.48 m
Rover 400 is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
720 litres1305 litres
Rover 400 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 585 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6901`780
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data3400
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv