Rover 400 1995 vs Kia Sephia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 56 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Kia Sephia. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.9 | |
|
The Kia Sephia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
720 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |