Rover 400 1990 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 139 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 9 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
| Rover 400 is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |