Rover 400 1991 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 67 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 121 NM | 123 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.2 seconds | |
Rover 400 engine produces 1 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.1 | |
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Rover 400 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 23 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen Berlingo, Citroen Xantia | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 400 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
Rover 400 is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`020 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
| |