Rover 400 1993 vs Audi 80 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 237 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Rover 400 engine produces 60 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Audi 80. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.4 | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Audi 80 1990: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
| Rover 400 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Audi 80 has
| |