Rover 400 1993 vs Audi 80 1991

 
Rover 400
1993 - 1995
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP140 HP
Torque: 237 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.8 seconds
Rover 400 engine produces 60 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Audi 80.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.49.4
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 400 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Audi 80 1990: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.48 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.41 m
Rover 400 is smaller.
Rover 400 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Rover 400 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80.
Turning diameter: no data11.2 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`830
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
Audi 80 has
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv