Rover 400 1993 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 237 NM | 167 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
Rover 400 engine produces 60 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.9 | |
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 520'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Lancer engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 23 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 200 | Used also on Mitsubishi Carisma | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
Rover 400 is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`045 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |