Rover 400 1993 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994

 
Rover 400
1993 - 1995
Mitsubishi Lancer
1994 - 1996
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 200 HP140 HP
Torque: 237 NM167 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.6 seconds
Rover 400 engine produces 60 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.47.9
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 400 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km520'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Lancer engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years23 years
Engine spread: Used also on Rover 200Used also on Mitsubishi Carisma
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.28 m
Width: 1.68 m1.68 m
Height: 1.40 m1.38 m
Rover 400 is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 410 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data10.2 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`045
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more power
Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv