Rover 400 1996 vs Rover 75 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 16 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.8 | |
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 200 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Rover 25, Rover 45 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 75 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 26 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 432 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 432 litres | |
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 400 has 38 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 400 (by 378 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Rover 75, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |