Rover 400 1996 vs Mitsubishi Galant 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Rover 400 and Mitsubishi Galant have the same engine power, but Rover 400 torque is 6 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.7 | |
| Rover 400 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |