Rover 400 1997 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997

 
Rover 400
1997 - 1999
Mitsubishi Galant
1997 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 105 HP90 HP
Torque: 210 NM202 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds12.8 seconds
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 400 engine produces 15 HP more power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Mitsubishi Galant. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.37.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 400 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1120 km on highway
850 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.63 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Rover 400 is smaller.
Rover 400 is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 470 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
810 litres1400 litres
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7201`870
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data2000
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv