Rover 400 1997 vs Seat Cordoba 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 41 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 86 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.8 | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 400 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 400 is 35 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 6 cm wider, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
| |