Rover 400 1996 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 86 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
Mazda Xedos 6 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 400 engine produces 54 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 6, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 9.0 | |
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 6, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
1240 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Xedos 6 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 200 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 9 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.36 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 390 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 400 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6. The Mazda Xedos 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 6. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`710 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mazda Xedos 6 has
| |