Rover 400 1996 vs Audi A4 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Audi A4 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 400 engine produces 34 HP less power than Audi A4, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Audi A4. Due to the lower power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.1 | |
|
The Audi A4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1580 km on highway | ||
| Audi A4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 21 cm shorter than the Audi A4, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
810 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Audi A4, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`690 kg | 2`015 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Audi A4 has
| |