Rover 400 1998 vs Volvo S40 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo S40, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.5 | |
| Rover 400 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 853 litres | |
| Rover 400 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S40 (by 43 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |