Rover 400 1998 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant is a more dynamic driving. Rover 400 engine produces 35 HP less power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. Due to the lower power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.1 | |
| Rover 400 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Galant gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |