Rover 400 1998 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 139 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 1 HP more power than Mazda Xedos 6, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Mazda Xedos 6. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.9 | |
|
The Mazda Xedos 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Xedos 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda Xedos 6 1992 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda Xedos 6 1992 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.34 m | |
| Rover 400 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 400 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6. The Mazda Xedos 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mazda Xedos 6 has
| |