Rover 400 1998 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1992

 
Rover 400
1998 - 1999
Mazda Xedos 6
1992 - 1998
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP114 HP
Torque: 143 NM139 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds13.7 seconds
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 400 engine produces 1 HP more power than Mazda Xedos 6, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Mazda Xedos 6. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.87.9
The Mazda Xedos 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 400 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
750 km on highway1050 km on highway
Mazda Xedos 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.56 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.34 m
Rover 400 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 470 litres390 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
810 litresno data
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Rover 400 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6. The Mazda Xedos 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 6.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6401`645
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Mazda Xedos 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv