Rover 400 1998 vs Hyundai Lantra 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 1 HP more power than Hyundai Lantra, but torque is 2 NM less than Hyundai Lantra. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.7 | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai Lantra, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
| |