Rover 400 1998 vs Ford Focus 2014
Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 143 NM | 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Rover 400 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Focus, but torque is 7 NM less than Ford Focus. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.51 m | |
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 7 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 476 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 1502 litres | |
Rover 400 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 692 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
| |