Rover 400 1998 vs Kia Sephia 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 27 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Kia Sephia. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.0 | |
| Rover 400 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 6 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity. Rover 400 has 100 litres more trunk space than the Kia Sephia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Rover 400 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
| |