Rover 400 1996 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 107 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda Xedos 6, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Mazda Xedos 6. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.6 | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 6, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Rover 25, Rover 200, Rover 45 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-3, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato, Kia Carens | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.34 m | |
| Rover 400 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 400 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6. The Mazda Xedos 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mazda Xedos 6 has
| |