Rover 400 1996 vs Hyundai Lantra 1998

 
Rover 400
1996 - 1999
Hyundai Lantra
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 112 HP114 HP
Torque: 145 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds10.5 seconds
Hyundai Lantra is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 400 engine produces 2 HP less power than Hyundai Lantra, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.9 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 400 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway910 km on highway
690 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Rover 25, Rover 200, Rover 45Used also on Hyundai Coupe
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 400 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.45 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.40 m
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai Lantra, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 470 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
810 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Lantra.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6401`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Hyundai Lantra has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv