Rover 400 1996 vs Seat Cordoba 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 37 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Rover 400 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 400 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 400 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 400 is 35 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 6 cm wider, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
| |