Rover 400 1998 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1996

 
Rover 400
1998 - 1999
Mitsubishi Galant
1996 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 103 HP150 HP
Torque: 127 NM179 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds9.7 seconds
Mitsubishi Galant is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 400 engine produces 47 HP less power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. Due to the lower power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.88.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.9 l/100km9.2 l/100km
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 400 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1000 km on highway
690 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.63 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Rover 400 is smaller.
Rover 400 is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 470 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
810 litres1400 litres
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5501`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data2000
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Mitsubishi Galant has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv