Rover 400 1992 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 20 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 200 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 5 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 400 has 140 litres less trunk space than the Seat Toledo. This could mean that the Rover 400 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |