Rover 400 1992 vs Audi 80 1991

 
Rover 400
1992 - 1994
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP140 HP
Torque: 185 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds9.8 seconds
Rover 400 engine produces 4 HP less power than Audi 80, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.29.4
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 400 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Audi 80 1990: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.48 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.41 m
Rover 400 is smaller.
Rover 400 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Rover 400 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`830
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 80 has
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv