Rover 400 1992 vs Kia Sephia 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 54 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Kia Sephia. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.3 | |
|
The Kia Sephia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Rover 400 is 9 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |