Rover 400 1991 vs Audi 80 1991
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 88 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 180 NM | 182 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
Rover 400 engine produces 2 HP less power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Audi 80. Despite less power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.2 | |
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
1270 km on highway | 1730 km on highway | ||
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 425 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
Rover 400 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`730 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Audi 80 has
| |