Rover 400 1991 vs Audi 80 1991

 
Rover 400
1991 - 1993
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 88 HP90 HP
Torque: 180 NM182 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds14.1 seconds
Rover 400 engine produces 2 HP less power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Audi 80. Despite less power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.2
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 400 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle1260 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1730 km on highway
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.48 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.41 m
Rover 400 is smaller.
Rover 400 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres425 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Rover 400 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6101`730
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv