Rover 400 1991 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 112 HP | 113 HP | |
Torque: | 138 NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Rover 400 engine produces 1 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, but torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.5 | |
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
Rover 400 is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`025 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |