Rover 400 1993 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 32 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.4 | |
| Rover 400 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 5 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 400 has 140 litres less trunk space than the Seat Toledo. This could mean that the Rover 400 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |