Rover 400 1993 vs Audi 80 1992

 
Rover 400
1993 - 1995
Audi 80
1992 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 103 HP71 HP
Torque: 127 NM127 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds15.4 seconds
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 400 engine produces 32 HP more power than Audi 80, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.27.9
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 400 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.48 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.41 m
Rover 400 is smaller.
Rover 400 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Rover 400 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5501`640
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 80 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv