Rover 400 1993 vs Audi 80 1993

 
Rover 400
1993 - 1995
Audi 80
1993 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 103 HP101 HP
Torque: 127 NM130 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds13.4 seconds
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 400 engine produces 2 HP more power than Audi 80, but torque is 3 NM less than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.28.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 400 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.48 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.41 m
Rover 400 is smaller.
Rover 400 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Rover 400 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5501`690
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv