Rover 400 1993 vs Audi 80 1993
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 HP | 101 HP | |
Torque: | 127 NM | 130 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 2 HP more power than Audi 80, but torque is 3 NM less than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 400 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
Rover 400 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`690 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
| |