Rover 400 1993 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 28 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 400 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
| Rover 400 is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |