Rover 400 1991 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 21 HP more power than Seat Toledo, but torque is 2 NM less than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.4 | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 5 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
| |